As a member of Campus Crusade for four years as
well as being in evangelical churches most of my adult life, I have sat in my
share of ’How to share Jesus’ classes. I
learned the Romans Road, the Four Spiritual Laws, the Bridge, and countless
variations of these gospel sharing tools.
I don’t like any of them.
After that admission, I’m not sure if I’ll still be accepted
in evangelical Christian circles.
I often hear evangelists talk about salvation as a free gift. They emphasize free, as in ‘requiring nothing in return.’ Does salvation really require nothing in
return? Jesus himself tells his
disciples about the persecution they will encounter, encouraging them to endure
(Matthew 10:16-25). Paul was constantly
telling the churches to “press on” (Philippians 3:14) and to “fight the good
fight” (1 Timothy 6:12). The first few
centuries saw countless Christians martyred for their faith. The twentieth century saw more Christian
martyrs than the previous nineteen centuries combined.
I ask, is salvation free?
Perhaps salvation is, but
living the gospel of Jesus Christ certainly is not.
I can hear someone now yelling, “justification by faith
alone.” I see your Romans 5:1 reference. I
ask, can salvation and living the Jesus way be separated? James tells us faith without works is dead
(2:14-26). The first letter of John says
“We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning”
(5:18). Hmm, it seems we have to jump
through some theological hoops to completely separate salvation from the way we live, but
I digress.
In evangelism, are we looking to “make disciples of all
nations” as Jesus commanded in Matthew 28:19 or are we looking to get sinner’s
prayers prayed? Are we looking to launch
people into a life of following Christ or are we merely passing out fire
insurance?
I have to believe the centuries of Christians who have been
persecuted and martyred would likely not describe their salvation as costing
nothing. Is their gospel different than
what we proclaim?
I am convinced the gospel Jesus announced and the apostles
proclaimed is much bigger than a ‘get out of hell free’ card. The gospel is ultimately about Jesus Christ
building a new Kingdom, a new way of organizing society, a new way of doing
life, a new way to be human. A gospel
reduced to heaven and hell minimalism is a different gospel than the blood of
the martyrs tells. A reduced soterian gospel
places me in the center of the story,
pushing aside the true storyline that’s about a loving Savior.
Perhaps I won’t be shunned from all evangelical circles. I
am content sharing the company of Christians like Tim Keller, Brian Zahnd, and
Scot McKnight.
So, what does this say about evangelism? I know these gospel tracts were written to
explain justification, which they may do well.
However, I cringe seeing them used as an introduction to the gospel. There has to be a better way.
How do Christians share the gospel without the bait and
switch effect a free gift of
salvation tract has when followed by prodding to join a bible study or to quit
sleeping around?
I really am asking you these questions. I don’t know their answers. Do you have some thoughts you would share over a Coke? Are there any books or blogs you’ve read that
address evangelism while keeping true to a full Kingdom gospel?
I believe in more of a discipleship method. Getting to know someone, showing them how I live, telling them about what Jesus has done for me, and then helping them along the way. For the past year I have been convicted to preach and teach more about how Christians should be living and the real cost of becoming a Christian. I think Ephesians 2:8-10 really expresses the full picture of grace and then out of that must come the fruit of salvation.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a big fan of open air preaching, but I think it can still be used if there were a better way to share Jesus without cheapening what Jesus has done. I'm not really sure what that would be, but I totally agree with you that this bait and switch probably isn't the best way.